In 1820 Lamé, together with his colleague Emile Clapeyron, went to Russia. We should give some background to this event which, on the face of it, looks rather a strange career move for the two young mathematicians. Alexander I was emperor of Russia from 1801 to 1825. The French Revolution and events in France which followed it, had shown Alexander the importance of scientific knowledge and its applications to military techniques and industrial development. He understood that for Russia to be powerful it must follow suit. He looked towards Europe and European scientists and tried to introduce policies to encourage them to cooperate with Russian scientists. He encouraged teachers to go to Russia to teach the latest scientific theories and to create scientific contacts between Russia and Europe. In line with this policy, the Russian government made a request to France who responded by sending Lamé and Clapeyron to St Petersburg.
Lamé was appointed professor and engineer at the Institut et Corps du Genie des Voies de Communication in St Petersburg. At first things were rather difficult for Lamé but later his visit proved highly productive. He lectured on analysis, physics, mechanics, chemistry, and engineering topics. He published papers in both Russian and French journals during his 12 years there, some jointly with Clapeyron. They published in, for example, the Journal des voies de communications, the Journal du genie civil, the Bulletin des sciences mathematique, the Receuil des savants etrangers, and Crelle's Journal (Journal für die reine und angewandte Mathematik) after it began publication in 1826.
In  an interesting episode which occurred during Lamé's time in St Petersburg is related. It concerns Lamé's attempt to spread Cauchy's new ideas of rigorous analysis. A professor at the Institute where Lamé taught had written a book which contained a proof of Taylor's theorem. Lamé produced a manuscript criticising the proof using Cauchy's arguments. Another side to Lamé's work in St Petersburg was his involvement in helping with plans that were being drawn up for building bridges and roads around the city. At this time he became more aware of the vast potential of railway development, and this would be a topic of great interest to him after his return to France. Before that, he was present when the Liverpool-Manchester line opened in England on 15 September 1830.
Bradley  gives a lot more detail regarding Lamé's time in Russia. She concludes in her paper that:-
... the repressive atmosphere in France during the period of the Bourbon restoration had made work abroad seem more attractive for research and the application of new ideas. Lame and Clapeyron seized an opportunity offered to them by successful French engineers already established in Russia who had taken with them the spirit of the early years of the Ecole Polytechnique. Important engineers like Betancourt and Bazaine helped them to pursue their careers in a land of scientific opportunity where their ideological convictions were strengthened through contact and discussion with their compatriots.In 1832 Lamé returned to Paris and at first he formed part of an engineering firm set up jointly with Clapeyron and two others. After only a few months, and still in 1832, Lamé accepted the chair of physics at the Ecole Polytechnique. He did not restrict his interests to teaching and research, however, for in remained an engineer ready for consulting work in that area. In 1836 he was appointed chief engineer of mines and he was also involved in the building of the railway from Paris to Versailles and of the railway from Paris to St Germain, which was opened in 1837.
Lamé was elected to the Académie des Sciences in 1843 when Louis Puissant died leaving a vacancy in the geometry section. In the following year he left his chair of physics at the Ecole Polytechnique and accepted a post at the Sorbonne in mathematical physics and probability. He was appointed to the chair of mathematical physics and probability at the Sorbonne in 1851.
He worked on a wide variety of different topics. Often problems in the engineering tasks he undertook led him to study mathematical questions. For example his work on the stability of vaults and on the design of suspension bridges led him to work on elasticity theory. In fact this was not a passing interest, for Lamé made substantial contributions to this topic. Another example is his work on the conduction of heat which led him to his general theory of curvilinear coordinates.
Curvilinear coordinates proved a very powerful tool in Lamé's hands. He used them to transform Laplace's equation into ellipsoidal coordinates and so separate the variables and solve the resulting equation. The trademark of Lamé's career was moving from one topic to another in a quite logical way but he often ended up studying problems very far removed from the original. This happened with curvilinear coordinates for he was led to study the equation
(x/a)n + (y/b)n+ (z/c)n = 0which, in non-homogeneous form he wrote as
(x/a)n + (y/b)n= 1which, with a = b is xn + yn = an so he was led to Fermat's last theorem. Although he was basically an applied mathematician, Lamé made a substantial contribution to the problem by solving the case n = 7. In fact he believed that he had solved the whole problem at one stage but he had overlooked the lack of unique factorisation in certain subrings of the complex numbers.
He also did important work on differential geometry and, in another contribution to number theory, he showed that the number of divisions in the Euclidean algorithm never exceeds five times the number of digits in the smaller number.
As we noted above, he worked on engineering mathematics and elasticity where two elastic constants are named after him. He studied diffusion in crystalline material.
Lamé was considered the leading French mathematician of his time by many, in particular Gauss who was never one to give praise easily held this opinion. Rather strangely he was more highly thought of outside France than inside, for the French seemed to feel that he was too practical for a mathematician and yet too theoretical for an engineer. His own opinion was that curvilinear coordinates were his most important contribution, but there are strange twists and turns in the history of mathematics and very soon after Lamé introduced them curvilinear coordinates became obsolete through the generalisations introduced by Hermite, Klein, and Bôcher.
Article by: J J O'Connor and E F Robertson
|JOC/EFR May 2000
The URL of this page is: